Det har kun fremkaldt små notiser i danske aviser, men jeg finder det altså (og ikke kun fordi jeg er abonnent) pænt sensationelt, at Dorthe Nors som den første danske nogensinde har en novelle, som heldigvis er rigtig god, i denne uges New Yorker, "The Heron" hedder den, "Hejren": det er og bliver sgu da stort at læse om Frederiksberg Garden og Damhus Pond som fiktions-lokationer, så dan begynder det (oversat af Martin Aitken):
I won’t feed birds, but, if you must, then you should do so in
Frederiksberg Gardens. There are tame herons in Frederiksberg Gardens,
and by placing the park’s benches at some distance from one another the
park authorities hope to avoid attracting too many birds to one area.
There are problems at the end of the park where the alcoholics sit,
especially with ducks, but I never go that way, and you can see the
herons everywhere. Of the heron itself, one can say only that from a
distance it looks impressive, but this doesn’t apply when you get close
up. It’s too thin, and the tame herons in particular look malnourished.
Most likely all that bread gives the herons of Frederiksberg Gardens bad
stomachs and is to blame for their not making an effort to fly.
Og her et klip fra et interview med Nors på New Yorkers hjemmeside:
The story takes a seemingly pastoral setting and reveals its
grimier side—the herons are skinny and sullen, alcoholics have taken up
residence at one end of the park, while stony-faced mothers wheel baby
carriages past the wrecked bicycles that litter the shores of Damhus
Pond. Could you have sent another character into the park on the same
day and come up with a very different fictional perspective on it?
Definitely! Danes claim to be the happiest people on the face of the
earth, and hardcore happiness takes place in Frederiksberg Gardens on a
daily basis. I could easily have described people playing soccer,
throwing birthday parties, having picnics, and eating ice cream. It’s
very idyllic and neat. But as a writer it’s fun to take a look at the
things that live in the shadow. The things that people condemned to
happiness would prefer to have removed from the picture. Not only the
alcoholics, the sick birds, and the violent incidents—but also Death and
other inconvenient stuff.
The great flocks of mothers circling the pond are another species
the narrator has little sympathy for. Did you always know your narrator
would harbor such vehement feelings about their possible fate? Or were
you surprised by the turn you found the story taking as you were writing
it?
Oh, I was surprised. I’m quite often surprised by what I write. About
the exploding mothers: even though I am a younger woman myself, I am a
little scared of women in the so-called ”mother groups.” I like the
support they offer each other, but meeting them when they are out
walking together is like meeting the Valkyries. You don’t mess with
them. You just get out of their way. I think it’s the power of
motherhood paired with the extreme competition between the mothers in
the group that cooks up something bad in them (that and the enormous
amount of cake that women eat in those groups). I didn’t plan to have
them explode, though. But BOOM, off they went.
Og meget mærkeligt: I metroen her til eftermiddag sad en ung mand med hættetrøje og læste det nummer af New Yorker, det har jeg aldrig set nogen gøre før, med noget nummer af New Yorker
SvarSlet- og jeg tror ikke, at det hang sammen med, at jeg minutter før på rulletrappen ned til toget på Nørreport øjnede BÅDE Baard Owe og Frederik Stjernfeldt!?
Lone Aburas om hættetrøjer bl.a., interviewet af Lise Garsdal i Politiken i dag:
SvarSletMen er der overhovedet nogen af personerne i din bog, du bevidst har gjort sympatiske? »Ja, med fare for at lyde som en terrorist, så kan jeg rigtig godt lide de unge, både døtrene (Martha og Sally red.), men også Rebeccas søn Oskar og hans ven Florian. De har det dér klarsyn. Måske fordi de er unge... Mark siger jo, at han kan genkende sig selv som ung i Oskar, og begræder, hvor fesent politisk han er blevet med årene«. Du siger ' fesent politisk', men er det ikke okay at skrive bøger og kronikker og følge med i den unge undergrund, når man er i midten af fyrrerne? »Jo, jo. Det er der ikke noget galt i. For Mark handler det bare mere om hans kunstneriske virke og hans identitet, end det handler om sagen. Og det er måske ikke så sympatisk. Jeg synes, han bliver grinagtig«. Mon ikke. Mark har foruden sin skriveblokering problemer med sædkvaliteten, og da Lone Aburas ifører den midaldrende Mark »et par alt for stramme bukser og en lige så tætsiddende hættetrøje«, nærmer humoren sig karaktermord på en ungdomsleflende generation.
»Jeg ved godt, det er strengt«, griner Lone Aburas, »men jeg er ikke en skid bedre selv. Jeg er 34, men tager også tit en hættetrøje på for at snyde lidt med alderen. Jeg kan sagtens genkende mig selv i Mark, og jeg ved ikke, hvordan jeg er som fyrreårig. Om jeg hænger ud i undergrunden og frygter at blive gammel«.