søndag den 17. januar 2021

Det Emily siger om smagshierarkier

- Nussbaum! - i en New Yorker-tekst om Sex and the City fra 2013, men apropos alt muligt fra Dickens til Helle, men ikke mindst Dickens og Helle! :

"So why is the show so often portrayed as a set of empty, static cartoons, an embarrassment to womankind? It’s a classic misunderstanding, I think, stemming from an unexamined hierarchy: the assumption that anything stylized (or formulaic, or pleasurable, or funny, or feminine, or explicit about sex rather than about violence, or made collaboratively) must be inferior. Certainly, the show’s formula was strict: usually four plots—two deep, two shallow—linked by Carrie’s voice-over. The B plots generally involved one of the non-Carrie women getting laid; these slapstick sequences were crucial to the show’s rude rhythms, interjecting energy and rupturing anything sentimental. (It’s one reason those bowdlerized reruns on E! are such a crime: with the literal and figurative fucks edited out, the show is a rom-com.)"

1 kommentar:

  1. SEX ER VAND

    Det store mysterium,
    der får alt til at flyde videre.
    Den ældste sammenhæng,
    som alt må følge.

    Hér kan man fortabe sig
    i øjeblikkes urolige strømme.
    Fortabe sig i øjeblikket,
    og komme først.

    Til at elske andre end sig selv.
    Jeg er, hvad du siger, jeg er:
    En fra det drømmende folk.

    En elsker.
    En nådesløs,
    barmhjertig ven.

    SvarSlet